<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Algorithmic Options Trading 1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/</link>
	<description>A new view on algorithmic trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:51:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew Dolder		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-93242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Dolder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-93242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had a thought for artificial options, and maybe I&#039;ll develop it further in a blog post, but maybe there&#039;s no need to generate the complete option history for certain types of trading systems.  For example, if trading signals come entirely from the underlying price series only, then calculate option prices at select times.  It&#039;s probably a matter of manually managing a set of CONTRACT structs script-side.  This can potentially save lots of time and disk space.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a thought for artificial options, and maybe I&#8217;ll develop it further in a blog post, but maybe there&#8217;s no need to generate the complete option history for certain types of trading systems.  For example, if trading signals come entirely from the underlying price series only, then calculate option prices at select times.  It&#8217;s probably a matter of manually managing a set of CONTRACT structs script-side.  This can potentially save lots of time and disk space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jcl		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-77255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-77255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The options data on the Zorro download page is not simulated. It&#039;s the real thing and has indeed OI and volume.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The options data on the Zorro download page is not simulated. It&#8217;s the real thing and has indeed OI and volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hast29		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-77253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hast29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-77253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi JCL, in the simulated SPY.t8 data from the Zorro download page, the fields Val and VolDate are filled with non-zero values. I assume, these are the open interest and trade volume values. They are also simulated with this script OptionsSimulate.c ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JCL, in the simulated SPY.t8 data from the Zorro download page, the fields Val and VolDate are filled with non-zero values. I assume, these are the open interest and trade volume values. They are also simulated with this script OptionsSimulate.c ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jcl		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-65388</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-65388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Syntax errors can be fixed by using correct syntax. There&#039;s a chapter in the Zorro manual about fixing errors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syntax errors can be fixed by using correct syntax. There&#8217;s a chapter in the Zorro manual about fixing errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jacob		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-65375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 20:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-65375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi JCL I hope it&#039;s not too far past the post date for you to see this question:

I downloaded the file, &quot;FRED-DTBR.csv&quot; and placed it in the History file for Zorro to attempt to generate the synthetic options data. I also tried changing the function to the &quot;yieldCSV()&quot; function so that it could grab the data directly from the csv file. 

However, I&#039;m still getting a syntax error when running the file with the code above to generate the data. 
the error: 


How can this be fixed?

Thanks a ton if you see this!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JCL I hope it&#8217;s not too far past the post date for you to see this question:</p>
<p>I downloaded the file, &#8220;FRED-DTBR.csv&#8221; and placed it in the History file for Zorro to attempt to generate the synthetic options data. I also tried changing the function to the &#8220;yieldCSV()&#8221; function so that it could grab the data directly from the csv file. </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m still getting a syntax error when running the file with the code above to generate the data.<br />
the error: </p>
<p>How can this be fixed?</p>
<p>Thanks a ton if you see this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jcl		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-63610</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 09:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-63610</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-63604&quot;&gt;Machou&lt;/a&gt;.

I would tell, but unfortunately that broker isn&#039;t paying me enough.

Broker&#039;s fees and margins are listed on their websites. Just compare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-63604">Machou</a>.</p>
<p>I would tell, but unfortunately that broker isn&#8217;t paying me enough.</p>
<p>Broker&#8217;s fees and margins are listed on their websites. Just compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Machou		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-63604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Machou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-63604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is the best api broker for trading option ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the best api broker for trading option ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tanner		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-62627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-62627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is your opinion on selling vertical spreads every month or two weeks in LEAPS? I&#039;ve been interested in compiling historical SPY and QQQ returns monthly/daily for each year over the course of its inception and selling spreads at least 1+ years from expiration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your opinion on selling vertical spreads every month or two weeks in LEAPS? I&#8217;ve been interested in compiling historical SPY and QQQ returns monthly/daily for each year over the course of its inception and selling spreads at least 1+ years from expiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Binary Today 5		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-18995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Binary Today 5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-18995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope that it&#039;s alright that I discuss this with just a few of my clientele, this will assist 
their knowledge of binary trading significantly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that it&#8217;s alright that I discuss this with just a few of my clientele, this will assist<br />
their knowledge of binary trading significantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jcl		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/algorithmic-options-trading/#comment-17688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financial-hacker.com/?p=2198#comment-17688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for your kind words. Finance is complex. My knowledge is even more limited and I&#039;m daily surprised by some results that I didn&#039;t expect. - In your example, the 15.23% volatility is the correct value. If you used a higher volatility period for higher expiration, then it depends on whether it&#039;s still annualized volatility or just volatility of a longer time. In the latter case the results are off by some factor, in the former case they are based on too old volatility and thus not up to date. - You&#039;re right about the implied volatility, since it is affected by the difference of theoretical and real option value. So you cannot use the script above for getting it. Otherwise you would just get back some approximation of the current volatility. You need real option prices for IV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your kind words. Finance is complex. My knowledge is even more limited and I&#8217;m daily surprised by some results that I didn&#8217;t expect. &#8211; In your example, the 15.23% volatility is the correct value. If you used a higher volatility period for higher expiration, then it depends on whether it&#8217;s still annualized volatility or just volatility of a longer time. In the latter case the results are off by some factor, in the former case they are based on too old volatility and thus not up to date. &#8211; You&#8217;re right about the implied volatility, since it is affected by the difference of theoretical and real option value. So you cannot use the script above for getting it. Otherwise you would just get back some approximation of the current volatility. You need real option prices for IV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
