Comments on: Petra on Programming: The Smoothed OBV https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/ A new view on algorithmic trading Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:00:53 +0000 hourly 1 By: Arnis Lapsa https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/#comment-75288 Fri, 08 Oct 2021 17:00:53 +0000 https://financial-hacker.com/?p=3373#comment-75288 Issue with “many many indicators” is that really fast they start to contradict each other and you end up with no signals whatsoever. So you are forced to either pick & tune them very carefully to complement each other or start adding layers where some of them rule over others. But hey – I like Vitali’s ideas more than fib retracements!

]]> By: spredge https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/#comment-67506 Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:12:16 +0000 https://financial-hacker.com/?p=3373#comment-67506 I was thinking the same thing… using ALMA instead of EMA 🙂
Great work, Petra!

]]> By: Quantocracy's Daily Wrap for 03/15/2020 | Quantocracy https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/#comment-64250 Tue, 31 Mar 2020 05:46:03 +0000 https://financial-hacker.com/?p=3373#comment-64250 […] Petra on Programming: The Smoothed OBV [Financial Hacker] […]

]]> By: me https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/#comment-64223 Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:56:48 +0000 https://financial-hacker.com/?p=3373#comment-64223 Nice Petra.

Replace EMA with ALMA and there you go 🙂

]]> By: trader https://financial-hacker.com/petra-on-programming-the-smoothed-obv/#comment-64186 Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:10:28 +0000 https://financial-hacker.com/?p=3373#comment-64186 Hi,
Maybe using tick volume would be an improvement.

]]>