<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Gap Momentum System	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/</link>
	<description>A new view on algorithmic trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 12:33:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Petra for again this excellence post. I am using your codes as a basis for my own development quite often. I do learn a lot from your coding.
Actually Perry Kaufmanns bible is a lifetime work for testing his ideas.

Martin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Petra for again this excellence post. I am using your codes as a basis for my own development quite often. I do learn a lot from your coding.<br />
Actually Perry Kaufmanns bible is a lifetime work for testing his ideas.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Silva		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for clarifying, this makes more sense. I appreciate the responses as I am a rookie.
On the calculation,  how are you calculating average annual ROI for QQQ? My quick calculations show ~38%.
If you could share the formula or source that would be really helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying, this makes more sense. I appreciate the responses as I am a rookie.<br />
On the calculation,  how are you calculating average annual ROI for QQQ? My quick calculations show ~38%.<br />
If you could share the formula or source that would be really helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Petra Volkova		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petra Volkova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The CAGR is indeed the normal metric, but in this case the ROI is used because capital is not re-invested. The misunderstanding is simply that you were confusing the end value with the annual return. Financial performance metrics are annual averages. The difference of some start and end value is not very meaningful. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CAGR is indeed the normal metric, but in this case the ROI is used because capital is not re-invested. The misunderstanding is simply that you were confusing the end value with the annual return. Financial performance metrics are annual averages. The difference of some start and end value is not very meaningful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Silva		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks again, but I think we may have a misunderstanding.

Are you referring to CAGR?

Because returning 12%, or even 20% over the entire duration of 11 years doesn&#039;t seem to be a noteworthy return at all.

Physically buying and holding QQQ over that time period will clearly net way above 12% from the time of the buy through the duration of the hold.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again, but I think we may have a misunderstanding.</p>
<p>Are you referring to CAGR?</p>
<p>Because returning 12%, or even 20% over the entire duration of 11 years doesn&#8217;t seem to be a noteworthy return at all.</p>
<p>Physically buying and holding QQQ over that time period will clearly net way above 12% from the time of the buy through the duration of the hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Petra Volkova		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petra Volkova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Index ETFs like SPY or QQQ are in the area of 5% to 15%, not 370%. 12% would beat the index when it is combined with smaller volatility. The best portfolio rotating systems produce about 20%, so the Gap Momentum system is not in the top area.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Index ETFs like SPY or QQQ are in the area of 5% to 15%, not 370%. 12% would beat the index when it is combined with smaller volatility. The best portfolio rotating systems produce about 20%, so the Gap Momentum system is not in the top area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: silva		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 04:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please disregard my previous comment. I realized the initial capital was 100,000. 

A more pressing question is about beating buy and hold. It seems that if one bought+held QQQ from 2011 to 2023, the return would have been more like 370%, going from ~$60 to ~$280.  The strategy would have to beat a 370% return, so 12% wouldnt be a beat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please disregard my previous comment. I realized the initial capital was 100,000. </p>
<p>A more pressing question is about beating buy and hold. It seems that if one bought+held QQQ from 2011 to 2023, the return would have been more like 370%, going from ~$60 to ~$280.  The strategy would have to beat a 370% return, so 12% wouldnt be a beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: silva		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 04:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thanks for this. in the equity curve above, it shows a return of $90,000 , which is a lot more than the stated &quot;12% return on investment&quot; that you mention in the text. Is this the right equity curve?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this. in the equity curve above, it shows a return of $90,000 , which is a lot more than the stated &#8220;12% return on investment&#8221; that you mention in the text. Is this the right equity curve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Petra Volkova		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petra Volkova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, Perry Kaufman, sorry for the typo. With the bible I meant the 1100 pages &#039;New Trading Systems and Methods&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Perry Kaufman, sorry for the typo. With the bible I meant the 1100 pages &#8216;New Trading Systems and Methods&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kssinath		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kssinath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing this. Very insightful.
Question: did you mean &quot;Perry&quot; Kaufman? And by &#039;Technical Indicator Bible&quot; did you mean his book: &quot;A Short Course in Technical Trading&quot;?

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this. Very insightful.<br />
Question: did you mean &#8220;Perry&#8221; Kaufman? And by &#8216;Technical Indicator Bible&#8221; did you mean his book: &#8220;A Short Course in Technical Trading&#8221;?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Quantocracy&#039;s Daily Wrap for 03/17/2024 - Quantocracy		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/the-gap-momentum-system/#comment-100238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quantocracy&#039;s Daily Wrap for 03/17/2024 - Quantocracy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 05:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://financial-hacker.com/?p=4701#comment-100238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The Gap Momentum System [Financial Hacker] [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Gap Momentum System [Financial Hacker] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
