<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trend Indicators	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/</link>
	<description>A new view on algorithmic trading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 14:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kiran Rama		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-92585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran Rama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-92585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tried all these trend indicators namely SuperSmoother, Laguerre, ALMA, LowPass filters into a ML model.
The AUCs/predictability of these features is not great
SuperSmoother 0.5257
Laguerre 0.53006
Decycle: 0.5322
alma: 0.5

The predictive power of these features in ML models is comparable to FMA which was 0.529 and to EMA which is 0.526. These do not offer any upside in predictability of returns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried all these trend indicators namely SuperSmoother, Laguerre, ALMA, LowPass filters into a ML model.<br />
The AUCs/predictability of these features is not great<br />
SuperSmoother 0.5257<br />
Laguerre 0.53006<br />
Decycle: 0.5322<br />
alma: 0.5</p>
<p>The predictive power of these features in ML models is comparable to FMA which was 0.529 and to EMA which is 0.526. These do not offer any upside in predictability of returns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kiran		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-90729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-90729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent. Thanks for sharing trend indicators. Functions like below that you shared are very useful to learn about how the indicators work internally

var Laguerre(var *Data, var alpha)
{
  var *L = series(Data[0]);
  L[0] = alpha*Data[0] + (1-alpha)*L[1];
  L[2] = -(1-alpha)*L[0] + L[1] + (1-alpha)*L[2+1];
  L[4] = -(1-alpha)*L[2] + L[2+1] + (1-alpha)*L[4+1];
  L[6] = -(1-alpha)*L[4] + L[4+1] + (1-alpha)*L[6+1];
  return (L[0]+2*L[2]+2*L[4]+L[6])/6;
}

Can you also please share the logic for BandPass filter similarly?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent. Thanks for sharing trend indicators. Functions like below that you shared are very useful to learn about how the indicators work internally</p>
<p>var Laguerre(var *Data, var alpha)<br />
{<br />
  var *L = series(Data[0]);<br />
  L[0] = alpha*Data[0] + (1-alpha)*L[1];<br />
  L[2] = -(1-alpha)*L[0] + L[1] + (1-alpha)*L[2+1];<br />
  L[4] = -(1-alpha)*L[2] + L[2+1] + (1-alpha)*L[4+1];<br />
  L[6] = -(1-alpha)*L[4] + L[4+1] + (1-alpha)*L[6+1];<br />
  return (L[0]+2*L[2]+2*L[4]+L[6])/6;<br />
}</p>
<p>Can you also please share the logic for BandPass filter similarly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Petra Volkova		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-75934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petra Volkova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-75934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm, maybe its just me but SMA and Alma with these periods look clearly different to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, maybe its just me but SMA and Alma with these periods look clearly different to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Guillaume		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-75834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillaume]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 17:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-75834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Based on your article, I was using a lot the ALMA ... until i noticed that it is almost equivalent to an SMA of lower period !
Just compare SMA 9 and ALMA 22, SMA 20 and ALMA 51, SMA 50 and ALMA 125... You will have the same thing, with no clear advantages to the ALMA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on your article, I was using a lot the ALMA &#8230; until i noticed that it is almost equivalent to an SMA of lower period !<br />
Just compare SMA 9 and ALMA 22, SMA 20 and ALMA 51, SMA 50 and ALMA 125&#8230; You will have the same thing, with no clear advantages to the ALMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jcl		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-65621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jcl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-65621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, it&#039;s a step response, not an impulse response.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s a step response, not an impulse response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Albert		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-65586</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-65586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, nice overview.

However there are some small definition typos in your post.
In the paragraph &#039;Comparing Impulse Responses&#039; it would be advisable to rename the text &#039;impulse response&#039; to &#039;unit step response&#039; or more simply &#039;step response&#039;.

An &#039;impulse response&#039; is a reaction to a spike (impulse) of a certain amplitude.
An &#039;unit impulse response&#039; is a reaction to a spike of amplitude 1.0.
A &#039;step response&#039; is a reaction to a step,
An &#039;unit step response&#039; is a reaction to a step of amplitude 1.0]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, nice overview.</p>
<p>However there are some small definition typos in your post.<br />
In the paragraph &#8216;Comparing Impulse Responses&#8217; it would be advisable to rename the text &#8216;impulse response&#8217; to &#8216;unit step response&#8217; or more simply &#8216;step response&#8217;.</p>
<p>An &#8216;impulse response&#8217; is a reaction to a spike (impulse) of a certain amplitude.<br />
An &#8216;unit impulse response&#8217; is a reaction to a spike of amplitude 1.0.<br />
A &#8216;step response&#8217; is a reaction to a step,<br />
An &#8216;unit step response&#8217; is a reaction to a step of amplitude 1.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: young		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-29197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 23:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-29197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are awesome! After seeing these lots of typical trial and error TA tutorials, I finally find some place where contains real things.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are awesome! After seeing these lots of typical trial and error TA tutorials, I finally find some place where contains real things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-13551</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-13551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering if this Zorro MA can be transferred into excel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if this Zorro MA can be transferred into excel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trend Indicators &#124; SAMUELSSONS RAPPORT		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-12466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trend Indicators &#124; SAMUELSSONS RAPPORT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-12466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Källa: Trend Indicators – The Financial Hacker [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Källa: Trend Indicators – The Financial Hacker [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scott phillips		</title>
		<link>https://financial-hacker.com/trend-delusion-or-reality/#comment-10376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott phillips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lotter.org/hacker/?p=19#comment-10376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a fully systematic futures trader and this is a truly superb blog, with many fascinating ideas which will spike further research in serious traders. You ought to be proud of stimulating this kind of discussion, kudos to you Sir.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fully systematic futures trader and this is a truly superb blog, with many fascinating ideas which will spike further research in serious traders. You ought to be proud of stimulating this kind of discussion, kudos to you Sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
